Assessment of the KAIMo Extension Request¶
Thanks for the request! I reviewed the demonstrator and the technical implementation. Here is my assessment:
Status (2026-02)
Variant B (LLARS integration) has been implemented. This text is kept as a historical assessment.
Short answer¶
Yes, this is feasible - and the idea of reusing LLARS platform logic is the right approach.
Three possible paths¶
Variant A: Simple solution (approx. 3-5 days)¶
Instructors create case vignettes using a Word template. A technical staff member then inserts them into the demonstrator.
- Pro: Fast to implement
- Con: Technical help required for each new case
Variant B: LLARS integration (approx. 2-3 weeks)¶
KAIMo is integrated as a module in LLARS. Instructors can create new cases via a web UI without technical knowledge.
- Pro: Instructors are independent, centralized management
- Con: Higher development effort
Variant C: With AI support (approx. 3-4 weeks)¶
Like B, but with AI-generated texts (summaries, consequence assessment, etc.), editable by experts.
- Pro: Maximum automation
- Con: Highest effort, AI output must be reviewed
Recommendation¶
For the study in January, I would recommend Variant A to quickly add 2-3 more vignettes.
In parallel, we can evaluate Variant B (LLARS integration) for sustainable long-term use in teaching.
Next steps¶
- Short alignment meeting to decide on the preferred variant
- If Variant A: create a Word template for case vignettes
- If Variant B: allocate capacity in the KIA team
Student assistants can help with both technical implementation and documentation/template creation.
Happy to help with any questions!